Replies to post #433841 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[blackhawks]

I see you did not comprehend what I posted. I clearly stated that full disclosure is necessary, as opposed to the knee-jerk don't tell them anything conservative response. Also, that reversal may or may not be possible, may be difficult. Why don't you confine yourself to responding to what I posted rather than projecting you own reading 'challenges' onto me?

Do you really imagine that any such teaching does not entail full disclosure, the pitfalls; It may or may not be successfully reversed, hormones are tricky? Do you accept the biology that one not homosexual nor transgender can not be 'recruited' to become someone that their DNA did not make them.

[fuagf]

conix, yet again again again and again an unwarranted

"I see that you are not well-read on the subject. Try a little more research on destransitioners."

and unjustified insult by you You have no idea on what he has read. In fact i would
guess he has read more on detransitioners than you have. Note your spelling.

I'd wager YOU haven't even read all in and around the relevant stuff in this post, and the links in it:

B402, Brave enough to bash transgender people in an ignorant and bigoted manner. C'mon.
P- conix, The right to be involved in gender fluidity is giving much greater life satisfaction for an increasing number worldwide. The fact that
you don't give a shit for the freedoms gained by increasing numbers who are benefiting from the care others have but you lack is on you.

[...]

To that i replied: conix, Yep. There will always be some, like the some 50% of so-called traditional marriages that end in
divorce. To my mind that stat sorta puts your somewhat rabid de-transitioning stance in some context.
[...and added some more information on the side she still takes ...]
How the far-right is turning feminists into fascists
"The Battle Over Gender Therapy
"Laura Edwards-Leeper and transgender people""

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170835656