conix, yet again again again and again an unwarranted
"I see that you are not well-read on the subject. Try a little more research on destransitioners."
and unjustified insult by you You have no idea on what he has read. In fact i would guess he has read more on detransitioners than you have. Note your spelling.
I'd wager YOU haven't even read all in and around the relevant stuff in this post, and the links in it:
B402, Brave enough to bash transgender people in an ignorant and bigoted manner. C'mon. P- conix, The right to be involved in gender fluidity is giving much greater life satisfaction for an increasing number worldwide. The fact that you don't give a shit for the freedoms gained by increasing numbers who are benefiting from the care others have but you lack is on you.
[...]
To that i replied: conix, Yep. There will always be some, like the some 50% of so-called traditional marriages that end in divorce. To my mind that stat sorta puts your somewhat rabid de-transitioning stance in some context. [...and added some more information on the side she still takes ...] How the far-right is turning feminists into fascists "The Battle Over Gender Therapy "Laura Edwards-Leeper and transgender people""