News Focus
News Focus
icon url

noradio

11/16/22 4:12 PM

#265752 RE: otterman #265750

Nope they go for the big tax free return, especially on companies that are on deaths door. Not a single share has been covered here, all in my opinion.
icon url

StayHumble

11/16/22 4:20 PM

#265753 RE: otterman #265750

"In no way would they ever tie up their money for 7 years. Thats not how they operate."

But because $DBMM fought the SEC and has maintained Compliance based on the Court Stipulations, Kramer/ ASHER unwittingly did so.... and now...

they'll HAVE "to cover, but take the loss and move on!"

Couldn't have said it better Myself

$DBMM shareholders are about to be Vindicated.
icon url

Stock_Barber

11/16/22 5:08 PM

#265757 RE: otterman #265750

Yup!

Actual understanding of the truth may be starting!

Maybe...


.
icon url

Fai 2

11/16/22 5:19 PM

#265761 RE: otterman #265750

Oh Ma. They did not expect to pay any of it. They thought DBMM was going away! BUT DBMM won won won won.

Read below in Quotes A link proved very bottom of my post hihi!

Quote A
"Another case you might want to do naked shorting is if you believe a company is about to go under. In this case, you would try to time the sale so that the issuer of the stocks you are selling goes bankrupt just after you finish the transaction—ensuring that you don’t get caught in your naked short selling."

"In no way would they ever tie up their money for 7 years. Thats not how they operate."


https://tokenist.com/investing/naked-short/