Who cares if its 69 or 50? There are some heavy hitters on this Author list that are world reonwed for thier research with GBM.
Confirmed today by source: The well orchastred short covering event for the past 1.5 months is almost over. Not confirmed by me personally but by someone who has inside access and who I trust 100% and knows the "game" inside and out. He himself bought 250,000 shares in the last 2 weeks.
Also, the ink is drying. Just watch what comes next.
The abstract is a summary of the journal article. These are not competing with each other. They're the same content though presented at different locations with disparate letterhead. An agreement was likely made between SNO and the journal publisher to accommodate this release. The journal will probably have more authors though SNO has an arbitrary author limit which we no doubt surpassed due to our Landmark Trial Data! So they truncated some from the abstract.
Their organization isn't used to having so many authors while the typical paper does not have 50! We should be glad we have so many supporting DCVax while I expect the journal itself will have more than 50. I believe it will be NEJM or JAMA with the first public reveal of the article being at SNO.
All my personal opinion. I told SNO to fix their website issue several times and reported this accidental leak on October 21st. They never responded to my emails. Nobody should have an advantage of information.