It seems obvious to me that the jury trying to convince the 4 holdouts that based on the definitions in layman terms wanted the transcript of Demaco's testimony. After getting the definition those that were actually paying attention, wanted the those that didn't, to see that what Demarco testified was an arbitrary act.
The longer this goes the foggier one's memory becomes. Our hope in winning diminishes each day that passes.
but IMO super dumb arrogant and wrong for court to request that says use different words as we do not find these words clear --------- by sending them the EXACT same words