Replies to post #261325 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Johnnycombat10]

We will all believe it's a LIE when it's proven in the market. Not on the board.

[Fai 2]

.50 to $2 According to the trained High paid lawyers and SEC first clue is extremely high irregular VOLUME. ALSO there is no way a TA would know hence "Naked Shorts" This is trading 101. See explanation below in quotes! LMAOOO

There was No Naked Shorts in the other ticker but miraculously it ran .50 to $9 Holla!

"What is “Naked” Short Selling?

Naked short selling is unlawfully short selling shares that have neither been borrowed nor located. If sellers are engaged in naked short selling, then the volume of stock may be larger than the tradeable shares in the market, which can lead to sellers failing to deliver securities sold by the settlement date."

[Fai 2]

. 50 to $10 lol Based on ACCURATE information posted on here shareholders were proven to right. Like DBMM working on getting the CE removed and now GLED dbmm MM.

ALSO I was in two tickers with GLED both ran to insane amounts one from .01 ish to .20 and the other .01 to .35 FACT!

CONSIDERING the connection with the other ticker that ran from .50 to $9 dbmm will make one HOLLA at a DOLLA.

[BLULLISH]

ROFL AHAHAHAAHA SHORT POSITIONS GETTING SQUEEZE AHAHAHA GO $DBMM

[Carjockey2]

Oh my goodness look at DBMM run