To me it's doubtful that speakers from most of the countries you listed wouldn't elicit protest against their speaking.
In fact I think it would be surprising if students in the groups that voted for condemnation wouldn't debate, 'if we're being consistent shouldn't we also object to.....?'
What am I missing? If the law students decided to condemn speakers from all countries that treat minority populations poorly, that's fine by me
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
