News Focus
News Focus
icon url

biosectinvestor

09/13/22 10:47 PM

#513667 RE: HyGro #513660

And the issues in that statement were addressed by a revised SAP filed prior to unblinding and approved by the regulators. You dismiss facts to continually quote a risk factor. Risk factors are mean to to state what are the absolutely worst things can happen, so that shareholders have heard absolutely anything that could possibly go wrong. But you know already for a fact that PFS is no longer the primary endpoint, OS is and you know the reason, the placebo arm having almost a 90% crossover, because of perceptions of success by patients and doctors, meant that they were able to use an external control arm, which was approved and discussed in the May and subsequent presentations.

So when you repeatedly post and say these things, knowing what you know and without discussion, you post incomplete information.
icon url

Roman516

09/14/22 7:40 AM

#513698 RE: HyGro #513660

The PFS points are a statistical objective, the OS data is the real results.
Unfortunately, confounded confusion and a lack of understanding about basic statistic is the real issue, NWBO is on the right track as their OS data results speak for themselves and supersede all other rebuke.
icon url

thermo

09/14/22 8:37 AM

#513702 RE: HyGro #513660

I've considered all of this, and I am long. The information in the paragraph you cite and been discussed on this board ad nauseum.