Did Dr. Toms say anything about the nOS confounding? Nope. But NWBO sure has. Dr. Toms is paid by NWBO and has a conflict of interest.
The data is confounded and the protocol is manipulated. Statistics without context is worthless. Even NWBO fessed up about the significant risk that regulators will reject the "statistics" because of confounding and manipulation of the trial. I'll believe them, they said it under oath with penalty of perjury.