Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,230.12
(
0.29%
)
US TECH 100
26,942.00
(
0.87%
)
Dow Jones
49,499.27
(
-0.31%
)
Brent Oil
107.80
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
78,455.00
(
0.33%
)
News Focus
News Focus

Replies to post #245785 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

Replies to #245785 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)
icon url

WebSlinger

08/31/22 4:34 PM

#245787 RE: rayovac812 #245785

<< PR's and patents are documented proofs >>

Forward-looking statements in PRs are not proof of anything. Almost every stinky-pink penny stock in the market print lies in their PRs. KBLB doesn't appear to be any different.

And KBLB has NO PATENTS. See here for more info:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=162548521
icon url

ImjinBridger

08/31/22 5:37 PM

#245792 RE: rayovac812 #245785

PR's and patents are documented proofs, but somehow not recognized as proof.


PR's are proof? If only! Even patents are only proof that he can do something in the lab.
icon url

DimesForShares

08/31/22 8:17 PM

#245800 RE: rayovac812 #245785

Rayo: “PR's and patents are documented proofs, but somehow not recognized as proof.”

Well, KBLB doesn’t have any patents, so there is no proof whatsoever there. PRs always use promissory language or context-free language. If they have doubled the amount of tests run, but we don’t know the number of tests before or after, there are an infinite number of possibilities covered under that kind of statement. Without context, useless.

So I disagree that PRs are proof.