Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,230.12
(
0.29%
)
US TECH 100
26,942.00
(
0.87%
)
Dow Jones
49,499.27
(
-0.31%
)
Brent Oil
107.80
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
78,215.98
(
-0.59%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 293674
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

DimesForShares

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 17
Posts 5017
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/13/2016

DimesForShares

Member Level

Re: rayovac812 post# 245785

Wednesday, 08/31/2022 8:17:30 PM

Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:17:30 PM

Post# of 293674
Rayo: “PR's and patents are documented proofs, but somehow not recognized as proof.”

Well, KBLB doesn’t have any patents, so there is no proof whatsoever there. PRs always use promissory language or context-free language. If they have doubled the amount of tests run, but we don’t know the number of tests before or after, there are an infinite number of possibilities covered under that kind of statement. Without context, useless.

So I disagree that PRs are proof.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent KBLB News
More KBLB News