News Focus
News Focus
icon url

hoffmann6383

08/04/22 12:33 PM

#501135 RE: HyGro #501122

fabricated b.s. only made it halfway through 3rd sentence
icon url

Dr Bala

08/04/22 12:39 PM

#501143 RE: HyGro #501122

Totally false. The trial results prove that DCVax-L is efficacious against rGBM too.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

08/05/22 2:10 AM

#501440 RE: HyGro #501122

So exactly how does this, what you call so-called “second dose”, affect the patient’s overall survival?

What that does is gives the patient a second dose that very likely affects their overall survival (OS).


LOLs
icon url

CherryTree1

08/05/22 7:08 AM

#501462 RE: HyGro #501122

OK so you are saying DCVAX-L is clearly an effective treatment and for those that received an additional dose even more effective. What is the delay lets Fast Track Approval and get this to the patients that need it.

. . . that does is gives the patient a second dose that very likely affects their overall survival (OS). NWBO has repeated stated that that crossover dosing confound the OS data -- that creates significant bias in the trial in the favor of DCVax-L as they get more doses that the SoC control arm . . .

icon url

CrashOverride

08/05/22 8:17 AM

#501475 RE: HyGro #501122

The fact that DCVax worked so well for crossover group, or rGBM, means it's the one stop shop for killing Glioblastoma. Thank you for making the case for approval!