InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hoffmann6383

05/23/22 12:57 PM

#477538 RE: VikingInvest #477536

Thanks for sharing your thoughts VI.
icon url

CherryTree1

05/23/22 1:00 PM

#477542 RE: VikingInvest #477536

I like your reasoning Viking.
It makes a lot of sense.

icon url

scotty3371

05/23/22 1:01 PM

#477544 RE: VikingInvest #477536

Nwbo needs more money, more dilutions; they need a partner; Linda powers' strategy of endless dilutions is not working.

Management needs to put up money for their warrants or lose them. What does it tell you that management won't pay for their warrants???

icon url

MarkoMD

05/23/22 1:09 PM

#477549 RE: VikingInvest #477536

What are your thoughts on how current stock price suppression will affect NWBO’s ability to raise additional cash. Seems to me it may provide a more significant “dilution effect” playing into the overall devaluation of the company as well as lost value to long term investors.
icon url

Bright Boy

05/23/22 1:14 PM

#477554 RE: VikingInvest #477536

Great post, Viking!! Certainly helps temper emotionalism ansd allows for the "new longs" to stay in the race!

On a quick note, 2 friends in the medical community in London told me over lunch that DCVax-L was a slam dunk for MHRA approval and that LP was better connected in the UK than anyone thet know!!! AND all this nonsense about comparative controls is complete child's play. If it works twice as well as the existing SOC, people are going to buy it !!

Cheers,

BB
icon url

Chiugray

05/23/22 1:25 PM

#477560 RE: VikingInvest #477536

VikingInvest, Very astute. From a painfully objective view:
- Management has no pressure to push the price up today. The market value will be $X billions when the news is released, and any fundraising and partnerships will be priced according to that market value then. Nothing is lost.
- Short selling of shares today to suppress the price, is short sighted. It only guarantees they become a locked-in buyer of shares tomorrow at a much higher price. Why? Because we already know the initial PR release of binary results will be tremendously successful. And timing of release, once available, is controlled by NWBO.
icon url

Horseb4CarT

05/23/22 2:41 PM

#477608 RE: VikingInvest #477536

Although a bit dramatic, the groundswell of support for DCVax L is growing given increasing awareness of the breakthrough advance for GBM, and eventually that DCVax is a platform applicable to many if not all solid tumors. The magma is moving and rising into the figurative volcano and the efforts to contain it may result in a blowout eruption! I warned you it might be dramatic, however it is analogous imo!

Looking forward to these next few weeks and then the long term!
icon url

WojD40

05/23/22 3:45 PM

#477633 RE: VikingInvest #477536

The reason for the absence of any media coverage of the NYAS presentation is simple.

The full Public Relations offensive is well under way, but all news outlets are under the same embargo that prevents the company from speaking about the results before the article is officially certified by the scientific journal as 'Peer Reviewed'. That's what all the newspapers and the company are waiting for. That 'certification' is No Small Thing.

The 2018 JTM Blended analysis was the top story on the BBC evening news (save for a minor terrorist incident). The edited 'package' contained interviews with doctors, patients and analysis from their science correspondent. I worked for the BBC for a time and the level of production of the piece suggested something that would've taken weeks to independently research, organise, shoot, edit and store in anticipation of the embargo lift. It came out the same evening as the article, and would've been briefed and produced long in advance.

The same thing is happening here. That's why there's no incidental coverage of the New York presentation. The news outlets already have the Big Story and are waiting for the green light.

DCVax is the biggest story in medicine (if not science) this year. The fact that no one reported on the presentation is proof to me that the media pump is being primed.

Added to the beauty of the science is the sheer human DRAMA of this whole caper. All the twists and turns, reversals and disappointments, are manna from heaven for bored science and finance journalists. It makes for a great narrative and we mustn't underestimate the power of that in our climate. Big Pharma, Evil Hedge Funds, David, Goliath, a Cancer Vaccine (surely Magic Beans...sounds like the water engine, no?...Ack! No! Look at the numbers!).

All sorts of curtains will rise and fall over the next few months.
icon url

hoffmann6383

05/23/22 5:52 PM

#477690 RE: VikingInvest #477536

Hey VI,

Thanks again for sharing your thoughts on the shorting of this stock. I defer to your expertise in this area as I'll probably never have the knowledge and insight that you possess. Your explanations on when to short and when to cover make sense. The part that I don't quite understand and I was wondering if you can offer any sort of explanation on is why some people seem to have financial incentive to post on message boards (this one excluded) and social media multiple times per day and for years on end spreading false negative narratives. Any idea what would give someone (or an entity) a financial windfall to engage in such daily activity for years on end? This sort of behavior doesn't seem to jive with your explanation on when to short and when to cover.

Thanks VI. Always appreciate your thoughts on these matters.