News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Skiluc

05/06/22 2:42 PM

#59663 RE: Myth #59662

10k spells out a company approaching opperational solvency, while also growing at increasing rates.

Not a bad trick for a startup thru a global pandemic. But thats perspective i suppose.

What is undeniable is how undervalued SNpW is. And im gonna make a boat load on the correction. Cheers.
icon url

Skiluc

05/06/22 2:45 PM

#59665 RE: Myth #59662

Realize SNPW is in bed with a Fortune500 right?
icon url

wallstreet1231

05/06/22 2:59 PM

#59672 RE: Myth #59662

100% agree with you. My opinion is a reverse potential has very little to do with establishing a higher price. I think it has a lot to do with modifying the share structure whereby potentially creating just under 1 billion shares for future issuance as needed.

A 1000 reverse would create roughly 999m post split shares for future issuance as may be needed. Current holders would own roughly 975,000 shares post split.

A 100 reverse would create roughly 990m shares post split for future issuance as may be needed. Current owners would own roughly 9,750,000 post split.

Further, if the shorts are shorting at the current price, I believe they would be further attracted to a higher price post split.

The above are the reasons why I am so against any reverse. And why I would like to see the 14c cancelled.

My opinions.