If AF got any confirmation of his thesis from LL I don't doubt for a Brooklyn second that he would have posted that instead of drawing a false conclusion from a clearly non-confirming exchange with a low-level source who even offered to set up a conversation with LL. For anybody willing to actually read the full exchange Adam posted it's patently obvious that AF's claim has zero credibility without that follow-up.
His 'journalism' in this is a joke. It's not just shoddy 'journalism' based on a source who clearly states she is not qualified to answer, his headline on the post is clearly a lie. Plain and simple his intent is to deceive.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
