News Focus
News Focus
icon url

hoffmann6383

03/16/22 1:38 PM

#451993 RE: The Danish Dude #451992

You are like an encyclopedia TDD! Thanks for sharing.
icon url

sukus

03/16/22 1:44 PM

#451996 RE: The Danish Dude #451992

Thanks Danish Dude. Amazing post!
icon url

exwannabe

03/16/22 1:53 PM

#452001 RE: The Danish Dude #451992

I am not forgetting about the MHRA guidance on biosimilars, I see nothing at all relevant in it.

Biosimilars do not have to prove efficacy, only "sameness" as the approved biologic. Direct needs to run trials to prove efficacy. So will -L in other indications.





icon url

flipper44

03/16/22 2:01 PM

#452004 RE: The Danish Dude #451992

Not certain that advancement applies to what you are arguing regarding Direct (potential) approval speed. They are tangentially related, but the primary relationship for Direct will be efficacy in its own right (as opposed to proving biosimilarity to DCVax-l)

On the other hand, DCVax-l automated (potential) manufacturing certification could be sped up by proving biosimilarity to manual product without the encumbrance of human/animal bridge efficacy studies.