lets say, for arguments sake, that Paladin is an attempt by Wmi Trust advisors to somehow devise a way to steal, as you say, assets that belong to the estate shareholders...........The WMI Trust was set up to pay off creditors.. right?, and the balance left over went to charity....right?......the WMI Trust was set up as a Grantors Trust and naming WMI as the beneficiary... right?.... now after exiting chapter 11, and creditors paid, all assets within WMI goes to the beneficiary, which is WMI.... right?......as beneficiary to these assets they can form a company called Paladin and offer to monetize THEIR ASSETS WHICH IS THEIRS BY RIGHT OF BEING THE BENEFICIARY .....right?.....ergo, there is no theft going on here, if in fact Paladin is associated with an offering of stock backed up with their assets. right?.....now, because you have these high powered names you mentioned associated with Paladin could be they are acting as official to bring Paladin to market.....Right?......... now, where do you infer that these officials are intertwined in some nefarious scheme to steal money from estate holders?....... Lodas