Replies to post #105491 on Regen BioPharma Inc (RGBP)

[pumper_stumper]

Right. I'd question the original assumption that they are "respectable". The pinks are a game of slime. Some are more slimy than others, but they all are in scam.

If I had a top 10 red flags in the pinks, one for sure would be is when I see "why would xxx associate with them if this was a scam"? I fought that line of thinking for years in my prior pet scam stock, and now the CEO is facing a criminal federal fraud trial. Guess what, suddenly that line of argument isn't being used there any more!


No one even has to bring up this topic with a real true investible company! No one has to say that because xxx is working with Microsoft that means Microsoft is real.

In other words, just the fact that these attempted comparisons need to be made as a way to say a company has a legitimate business, means it isn't legitimate!

[joe botts]

Awwww golly thank ya!!!

[Musical Shares]

Good responses.

Is he associating himself with the company? One tweet doesn't exactly prove that.

I agree. You said it perfectly.

His name is on practically every Patent so he does have an interest. What amount of $ he'll get if any of it ever comes to market is anyone's guess

I agree. You said it perfectly.

but he has posted in the past, I believe on Twitter, that he got screwed over by Koos.

If you can recall, how did he get screwed over?

Again, he is pretty good in responding to emails unlike Koos. You should ask him directly.

This is true. :)

But let's not be blind to the fact that Ichim is an opportunist as well.

Maybe. :)

I'd argue he isn't respected at all. He's an unknown to be honest and a failure like Koos.

Respected is subjective here.

I would say he is respected (although he is unknown to some degree if you are relating to other "more popular" scientists). Of course, most scientists are not "famous" by any stretch.

His papers are not "famous" but they do have quite a few citations, with some being cited by other well-known researchers.

I am not sure how he is a failure... He had a good reputation with Cornell and did some good things there (this can be verified).

Could be that Lander knows the only way to get his back pay is to continue to do business with Koos and get paid via that route instead of directly working for him.

I wouldn't disagree with this hypothesis.

I know you have looked into the past of Koos and his companies. At what point was Koos or any of his companies successful?

I have. :)

19 and counting.... and none.

And some as shady as the next.