Replies to post #713946 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Golfbum22]

too bad our loser lawyers couldn't be troubled to say your last sentence in all the different courts

"HERA allows FHFA to appoint itself as conservator, so it really made no difference if the companies consented or not. This sets a precedent for legislation that allows the government to loot any company regardless of their consent."-your sentence in quotes deserves a sticky!!

Thompson needs to be fired or benched

he sounds like a pompous arse and doesn't make this simple stupid for the judges so they have to do their jobs

he alone has given them too much leeway to rule and delay and help the govt

fire him

bench him

do something because he is not likable, he comes across as a know it all pompous engineer

time to get replaced because you have failed miserably

you need to be likable to win

we need Epstein

[MoneyRobot]

I always said HERA is solid but nws is not. The goal needs to be knock out the nws which was rescinded.

I will take any win with lamberth. Pps will rise to sell into. Hold some trade some.

Without the nws, fnf will eventually retain adequate capital and hopefully restructure, ipo and the gov sell its position into the open market.

[familymang]

You should read the Lamberth ruling more closely. He already addressed our concracts claim in context of takings vs contracts and why there are different expectations for both scenarios. He already assumed we lost the takings claim in his ruling. His key point is takings is vs the government and contracts claims is vs the GSEs themselves (GSEs would owe us damages if we win Lamberth), and while one could have expected the government to take everything, no one could have expected the GSEs to agree to such terms in exchange for “nothing”, which is why the GSEs themselves breached our contracts.