Wednesday, March 09, 2022 7:55:18 AM
You should read the Lamberth ruling more closely. He already addressed our concracts claim in context of takings vs contracts and why there are different expectations for both scenarios. He already assumed we lost the takings claim in his ruling. His key point is takings is vs the government and contracts claims is vs the GSEs themselves (GSEs would owe us damages if we win Lamberth), and while one could have expected the government to take everything, no one could have expected the GSEs to agree to such terms in exchange for “nothing”, which is why the GSEs themselves breached our contracts.
GSEs Litigation 2022
1) Lambert breach of contracts case: Trial July 22, Decision expected 2H' 22
2/3/4) Collins/Rop/Bhatti unconstitutional remedy cases: Decision(s) expected 2H '22
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
