News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HokieHead

03/04/22 2:35 PM

#75970 RE: rmarc #75969

How do we know he hasn’t? As an actual shareholder I know it’s getting done. Next..
icon url

surfkast

03/04/22 3:03 PM

#75973 RE: rmarc #75969

If you fail to support your motion with a memorandum of points and authorities, the court could deny the motion because you have implicitly admitted there is no basis for it. (EDCR 2.20(c); JCRLV 11(a).)
icon url

Hi_Lo

03/04/22 5:41 PM

#75983 RE: rmarc #75969

The perplexing GVSI question is why Sharp hasn't filed a motion in court to cancel the preferred stock like he said he would...Bottom line is Sharp should have submitted this motion a month ago but didn't. Assuming Sharp still owns 20 million shares, it is in Sharps best interest to file this motion ASAP but he hasn't. Why? No memorandum of points & authorities to support cancelling the preferred stock?


EXACTLY!

Something similar happened to Sharp's other G ticker. When he tried to cancel preferred shares. An ex-CEO came out of the woodwork to claim that he owned preferred and common shares. Sharp's lawyer quickly proved that the ex-CEO (who was an admitted fraudster because of an SEC investigation) had no proof that he had legally paid for the preferred shares that allowed him to take control of the company, so he was able to cancel those preferred and common shares easily.

If an ex-GVSI principal contests the preferred shares that Sharp seeks to cancel, and he has legal proof as to how he acquired those shares, then GVSI has a HUGE PROBLEM.

That could be why Sharp hasn't said or done anything concerning GVSI. Hence the long list of problems with the court, the SEC, the Nevada SOS, and Sharp not furthering GVSI out of the Expert Market. He has not meaningfully updated anything concerning GVSI...crickets.

His other two tickers have come out of the Expert Market or are about to...except GVSI.

Sharp could quickly and easily resolve this uncertainty - but he hasn't.

Like I said - this is a dumpster fire.