The perplexing GVSI question is why Sharp hasn't filed a motion in court to cancel the preferred stock like he said he would...Bottom line is Sharp should have submitted this motion a month ago but didn't. Assuming Sharp still owns 20 million shares, it is in Sharps best interest to file this motion ASAP but he hasn't. Why? No memorandum of points & authorities to support cancelling the preferred stock?
EXACTLY!
Something similar happened to Sharp's other G ticker. When he tried to cancel preferred shares. An ex-CEO came out of the woodwork to claim that he owned preferred and common shares. Sharp's lawyer quickly proved that the ex-CEO (who was an admitted fraudster because of an SEC investigation) had no proof that he had legally paid for the preferred shares that allowed him to take control of the company, so he was able to cancel those preferred and common shares easily.
If an ex-GVSI principal contests the preferred shares that Sharp seeks to cancel, and he has legal proof as to how he acquired those shares, then GVSI has a HUGE PROBLEM.
That could be why Sharp hasn't said or done anything concerning GVSI. Hence the long list of problems with the court, the SEC, the Nevada SOS, and Sharp not furthering GVSI out of the Expert Market. He has not meaningfully updated anything concerning GVSI...crickets.
His other two tickers have come out of the Expert Market or are about to...except GVSI.
Sharp could quickly and easily resolve this uncertainty - but he hasn't.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
