Replies to post #372144 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[sstyles]

Excellent post!!

[rafunrafun]

One of my favorite posts ever written here. 100% in agreement.

[marjac]

oneragman,

I wholeheartedly share Raf's and styles' enthusiasm for your post. You see the pathetic reality of this broken company very clearly, and then articulate those realities brilliantly. Well done.

[retinadoc]

Well stated. The combo pill should have been in development and ready for primetime. One more major fail for management. Zip is correct that it will bring brand awareness to Vascepa and rescue the US while litigation drags on. Amarin is once again delusional if they think that they can bring this to market with a GIA strategy. KM is a Europe specialist and needs to focus and stay in that lane. At the very least a joint venture with a BP for R&D, sales and marketing, needs to inked now or else the combo pill will be a cash black hole that will destroy what is left of shareholder value.

I think Sarissa knows this, we will see.

[invest2992]

we are hanging our hopes on Denner, but what if he is content with a BO price of $12-13 or about 3x his cost? Or a profit of about $200 million?

[lizzy241]

oneragman, I agree with every word in your message. For the management of amarin it doesn't matter how long the approval process takes they still are rewarded with free shares and options. I've said this many times, management is running the company as if it was a private company as long as they execute the minimum required by the SEC they're in compliance. Don't you think that Denner is well aware of this situation? That's the reason he owns 6.06% of the outstanding shares. He has a plan we have to wait to see how it will evolve.

[Jasbg]

onerag,

The only difference is KM speaks better than JT. As far as bold action, there is none.

I saw ILT at the time F4's were made public - some weeks ago - even making the argument - that Management and BOD to some extend 'benefits in the very low Share Price' - in the way that the the Bonuses a calculated to be worth a given amount of money on the day of the F4 announcement.

ILT made an example say the SP were value times 3 of today ($9 - 10) Management and the BOD - would "only" get a 1/3 of the shares in bonus.

This is in many ways an ugly way of undermining ones trust and belief in that Management and BOD of the Company does everything to bring the value up for its investors.

Way to solve this - were to 'as all logic and decency would suggest', only hand out F4's if the SP had been rising - and in numbers of shares - directly linked to degrees of improved value of the Company.

There ought to be made rules avoiding thefts from investors this way - but that is not likely going to happen.