News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Zorax

02/13/22 11:05 AM

#401147 RE: SoxFan #401145

You would think that would be a logical route. But given the now known quality of life of that dog owner (if they really were his dogs) it's likely he has no insurance or anything of property value to garnish.

Looks like the guy is going to be tied up with other issues already.
icon url

fuagf

02/13/22 6:16 PM

#401287 RE: SoxFan #401145

Don't look forward to the hassle, but it looks i will be seeing legal aid. The question of
the dog being put down is apparently in the council's and finally the court's hands.