Zip, I ran out of posts quite early yesterday and have been stewing about this all night. I wake up to find your post touch on some of my sentiments.
At the very start, Marjac starts out "..I am going to focus the argument today on 4 broad themes: 1) fraud, 2) mistake, 3) abuse of discretion, 4) institutional integrity". And before another word can come out of Marjac's mouth, he gets barraged with the standing BS. There was even at one point when Marjac is questioned about "only reason you are here is because you did not like the previous verdict" (paraphrase).
Well, for shit's sake isn't that the definition of an appeal and yes I know this is not a pure derivative suit.
So thinking along your lines coupled with the fact that I am very old now and have no patience anymore, if this was a suit where I was only representing myself I would have told those judges interrupting me to look in the damn briefs and let me finish. Of course Marjac was representing many of us and did restrain himself and really did a marvelous job. Imagine that, his first time in front of that court and his performance should be used as an instructing tool.
I think too, that I can't possibly believe, that anyone who listened yesterday, did not come away with being hugely upset with Amarin's legal team and strategy. It is one thing to be worried or ashamed of the mistakes they made in the past, but to not join Marjac's effort means they don't give a shit about the company. I think we know that already by all the actions/non-actions in their day to day management of the company anyway, but it was so glaring yesterday.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
