Great summary and read of the nuances. As you say, I think she will be able to sway one of them with the possibility of a scathing dissent!!
Hats off to Marjac for an amazing job of articulating the facts, and getting the fraud points identified, despite the panels constant focus on standing and timing. A top notch attorney!! Thanks!!
There we were at the orals … an opportunity for any one of the three judges to ask hikma/ reddy lawyer “ can you just explain to us how the post finding of facts contained a cropped table which cropped table omitted the legend that the K study showed no statistical significance between the groups”
Or “do you recognise that the Mori paper was in fact statistically flawed”
And “absent K and Mori where is the clear and convincing evidence rendering the patents obvious ?”
No knife was dug into the generics back ….
We live in Hope but there was little comfort in the lines of questioning
Marjac the magnificent
He surely was just the in the face of a very hostile Dyk and Rena
Absurd that the issue of who is Epadi was raised at oral - (although I feared this may come up )-surely a preliminary matter if relevant to have been raised by the court and or by the generics in their response brief -
And it took time away from the central issues in the orals
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
