Replies to post #185382 on PCT Ltd (PCTL)

[gosox12]

Great post. You might want to make sure that the new PR guys and PCTL management are aware of all this. That's some huge dollars we're talking about here.

[idccwin]

The o/g companies should be lined up with contracts in hand for our technology and SP should be at least .20 .

[Mugwumps88]

Maybe you should forward our info to her office. What would make us all millionaires (except NT and JR) is a gov't mandate that our technologist be used.

[Evaluate]

you wrote:

Katie Porter is a fire cracker on the environment. She would be one to lobby heavy.
Today’s hearing concentrated on gulf & Calf off shore wells. The committee also responsible for capping on shore wells.
Porter stated 39 billion spent on cleanup/ removal of platform (by the government) the industry spending was 10% of that as many of them go bankrupt ( just like on shore wells).
There’s been something like 4.3 B set aside for oil well cleanup/ capping.
All of which the government could save if the wells could be reopened to generate additional oil that pctl process produces.
With the reopening of old wells permits could require the owner to produce a bond for cleanup/ capping.

I do not think that the PCTL process/fluids could be a solution for the issues you describe.
I do not think the government could save 4.3 B.