News Focus
News Focus
icon url

FeMike

12/20/21 10:30 PM

#428260 RE: iwasadiver #428258

I’ve said six times “what I’m trying to say”.

You all just won’t listen to me because you just witch hunt all day.

A poster gave bad information saying that approval is basically a guarantee now because of the certification. His basis for saying this was that MHRA wouldn’t certify a facility to produce a vaccine that doesn’t work and isn’t going to get approved.

This is patently false and misleading to investors that don’t know any better. Some people may think that the application was for DCVax-L specifically (very important word, specifically. I know they got certified so that they could produce DCVax but that does NOT mean the cert is specific to DCVax) and that because of this, MHRA reviewed the actual efficacy and safety of DCVax-L and that was part of their decision. This is not the case and it is important that people know this.

If it were the case, I’d be buying against mortgage tomorrow. It is an important distinction to make. This is great news, a huge step in the process, very good sign for what’s ahead, but don’t make it more than what it is. It’s good enough without throwing out the “this means approval is done deal!” trope.