News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #48693 on Funr (FUNR)
icon url

reader3

12/15/21 3:06 PM

#48694 RE: bradenhead #48693

How does this figure into your assessment?



Despite any rumors to the contrary, CUBV has no intention of eliminating shareholders via reverse split. We do however intend to cancel any and all shares issued to or by Alex Procopio to himself or to any of his “straw men” for no consideration.





icon url

Jimmy Joe

12/15/21 3:18 PM

#48696 RE: bradenhead #48693

Excellent post, and an in depth analysis on what may occur in the near future.


No push back from this investor. You have obviously been through the rigors of this type of play before or have experience in this type of situation professionally.

Thank you for your accessment.

Sincerely,
JJ

$Lithium
icon url

wingtrade

12/15/21 4:43 PM

#48712 RE: bradenhead #48693

Thanks for this well thought out post. Where I have a disagreement with this assessment is surrounding the merger providing no capital and the timing of a potential R/S. The logic makes sense, but I think you are making some big assumptions. Some things to consider:
In my opinion it looks like significant portion of the unrestricted O/S may be moving to the new company at closing. Actually I think this may be the only reason a company of the caliber of a lithium operator in Salton Sea may even be in consideration here. There were 400M shares recently unrestricted with recent T/A change. And potentially up to another 1B shares that based on my observations so far... it is unclear if they have ever changed hands in the public market despite being held at DTC for a long time. Until not long ago, the stated public float was only about 500M shares despite the O/S being 6x higher for a long time. The custodian in this case may control a very significant number of free trading shares which theoretically may be part if this merger transaction, and which could represent more than enough shares to fill out a Reg A offering of the size you described.
Regarding R/S timing, in my opinion, it would not be out of the realm of possibility to see a small R/S much further down the road, intended to qualify the stock for listing on a major exchange. It is not the most likely scenario, of course this is still the OTC wild west after all... but do you see any reason to completely rule out the possibility?
None of us knows what will happen here, but so far I have been very impressed with the progress and I remain optimistic this could see an organic appreciation in price towards $1 if the merger is well executed and truly accretive. Glta
Edited to fix some typos
icon url

go4yordream

12/15/21 5:04 PM

#48715 RE: bradenhead #48693

Very excellent post Bradenhead! You obviously have a lot of knowledge! Assuming things play out along the lines you suggest, would you please share your thoughts as to how high of a spike you think is realistic after merger announcement? Thank you for your contribution to this board!
icon url

Penny2Dime

05/10/22 7:19 PM

#53482 RE: bradenhead #48693

Hello bradenhead,
Can you share your thoughts?
TIA.
icon url

Penny2Dime

06/17/23 1:44 PM

#57782 RE: bradenhead #48693

Hi bradenhead,
Is it time now?!