InvestorsHub Logo

gilead23

12/12/21 5:47 PM

#432 RE: littlefish #431

I’ll have to go back and listen to the exact verbiage, but yes that would leave him some wiggle room. I still think 2-3 cents is probably a decent bet for normalized numbers but probably towards the low end of that. To wind up higher they would have to be understating the annual ebitda and rounding down. That just doesn’t seem in character.

The improved interest expense should help the bottom line and they are suggesting some sequential ebitda improvement so I am working on the assumption of improved sequential numbers on a normalized basis.

The exact top line is probably less important than the bottom line anyway. I still see it as more of a 3-6 month trade although the track record was there with acustaff. Their industry tailwinds here should be huge which I really like.