No problem Doc. I had previously discussed some of the language and put the discussion to rest at one point, but they keep coming back with new spurious arguments and had some of the old links and the old agreement in my notes from that previous dive into the details. When they kept doing that, I knew the answer but also was lazy about going back and putting all the details together. It gets tiresome at some point with all of these false narratives, many of them variations on previous arguments that were finished previously. Repetition...
ATL has also been kept telling us that this binding agreement is still alive as the timelines of the agreement hasn't expired yet. Why do the bears care if we need CRL or not while they always claim the trail failed, LoL.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
