News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BullNBear52

11/29/21 6:18 PM

#193562 RE: k9narc #193561

Which would have been shipped overseas. In the meantime the pipeline had the potential to endanger the largest aquifer in the USA.

My suggestion is Canada build their own refinery.

icon url

jbsliverer

11/29/21 6:33 PM

#193563 RE: k9narc #193561

Along with taking out endless amount of $$ jobs and income from the shipping route that it would replace. The jobs created building the pipeline would be for the most part be temporary. The jobs and business lost to the pipeline would be permanent. So there's that as part of the not so simplistic equations.
icon url

Zorax

11/29/21 8:28 PM

#193570 RE: k9narc #193561

Further perusing of scientific and industrial journals would show that almost 95% of the product from the proposed keystone, ALL of keystone transmissions would bypass the entirety of the U.S. All the propaganda from keystone was of course manipulated.

It was also on good sources that less than 40 people would need to be active to work the pipe and nodes and a large percentage of these were to be imported in from keystones own plants in Canada. And many were not full time. It really doesn't matter how many gallons or million of barrels are moved if they pass totaly through Americas's wildernesses and endanger water aquifers all across the country, let alone the protected lands and Indian lands they wanted to trash, then the only benefit is a Canadian oil company that might be owned by foreign interests in the first place. Who really owns keystone?

All the republiqans getting the donor monies from Canadian oil are all screaming not fair, and hopefully have to give some back.