Replies to post #361311 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[ziploc_1]

shadolane "Refusing to acknowledge errors then correct them is at issue here. No matter how many should have caught them."

Judge Du was of the legal onion that EPADI did not have "standing" to bring the fraud/mistake appeal...therefore she did not have the opportunity to correct her error in the original case.

Our appeal of her finding has two components:
1. EPADI DOES have legal standing to petition the court to correct judge Du's error.
2. If the appeals court accepts that we have legal standing, it can either correct the error itself or refer it back to judge Du for correction.