News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sortagreen

11/23/21 8:30 AM

#391759 RE: brooklyn13 #391757

to not think he was biased towards the defense is, in my opinion, willfully ignoring the obvious



Like not allowing the prosecution to introduce video of Rittenhouse wishing he could kill people with his AR?


Like not allowing the prosecution to introduce video of Rittenhouse beating up a teenage girl?


Yeah... There might have been some bias there.
icon url

Homebrew

11/23/21 9:02 AM

#391762 RE: brooklyn13 #391757

A black kid should also be found innocent. Regardless, a real trial outcome should not be influenced by the hypothetical outcome of a hypothetical trial.
icon url

B402

11/23/21 9:57 AM

#391767 RE: brooklyn13 #391757

But to have watched snippets of that trial and to not think he was biased towards the defense is, in my opinion, willfully ignoring the obvious.

A biased Judge was my opinion also based on snippets...I ended up watching the whole trial, or the vast majority, and looked up some of the facts..

To your particular point, the Judge said they 'could be' called rioters and looters 'if' they were proven to do so'...So you left out some of what was actually said.....big difference.....to my knowledge none were called any of those except Rosenbaum, and they called him a nut case....

White privilege eh...oh boy...not everything is about race,,,
and when its used and not appropriate it hurts the civil rights cause... Look to the Arbery case for race..And see what happens if they are acquitted...But I don't think they will be

I want the rule of law for 'everyone',,,,,Rittenhouse, a person of color, the richest or an ex president (if you get my drift)...Everyone!

A lot of misconceptions about the Rittenhouse case that will never be cleared up,,,,Plenty of bias confimation went on till the actual trial,,,,I think you will see people move along from it now just for that reason.......