Zip, I couldn't agree with you more. Boggles the mind why they don't support the rule 60 case and it is definitely a question they should answer. Speculation by some is that it would highlight how they screwed up the original case. But we know all that already. Support the rule 60 case would show that they want to correct their mistakes.
zip, I agree. It is certainly not the expense. As fiduciaries to the shareholders, they should have come out in support of the effort. In fact, for a multitude of reasons, the effort should not have even been needed, yet here we are.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
