News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Doc logic

11/13/21 12:31 PM

#417353 RE: exwannabe #417341

exwannabe,

You are right that the wording is not definitive which is what longs have become used to but.. the wording is also pointing in the direction of a BLA/MAA which is the carrot right? The reason the carrots were given is because Linda Powers wants us all to hang with her for the duration any way we can so that we can all celebrate at the finish line. She is not in control of the changing road course due to the whether conditions. You know, like whether or not regulators would change guidance or grant buy in to the SAP. Like whether or not timing of the journal article could be lined up with other things to keep the attackers at bay. Whether or not a manufacturing model could be put together in a timely way to catch up to potential demand created by L becoming SOC in GBM and rGBM then off label use. That’s a lot of whether to get past to get to the point of submitting a BLA/MAA and the storms have not been short and easy. The question is whether or not you are going to miss another 10 bagger+ again or not. If you do, that means you missed a 100 bagger while being duly informed from this board. Best wishes.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

11/13/21 12:41 PM

#417356 RE: exwannabe #417341

JR suggested in his post that after looking at the data, the company no longer needed to expand those contracts.

And while I don't have any idea what the status of those contracts are - whether they are the same, expanded, or even reduced - I was simply pointing out that the company does seem to be referencing them (the SAB) in their filings a lot more than in previous filings. That might suggest that their roles have increased. Still... maybe they aren't being paid anymore than they were previously for what might appear to be additional work.