News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MI Dendream

11/12/21 7:23 AM

#416935 RE: MI Dendream #416934

By now, there are lots of people that have seen this data. They have told me so themselves on Oct 5, 2020.

That creates quite a lot of risk as loose lips sink ships.

If I were a warrant holder and I was several steps removed from a SAB member, but somehow came across a statement from a SAB that indicated to me that we have troubled waters ahead, I would probably purchase my warrants and dump them ASAP. Has that happened?

It is not safe to assume warrant purchasing has been friendlies helping the company out. Something doesn’t seem right about orchestrating that to me. It feels like collusion and that is not an accusation, it is a feeling.

Enquiring minds want to know.
icon url

HappyLibrarian

11/12/21 8:14 AM

#416947 RE: MI Dendream #416934

You make a good point:

Management supporters keep saying how NWBO cannot be held to the same standards, especially in investor and public relations as other firms because of their size etc. As you pointed out, a BLA at a Big Pharma would not necessarily be material, as it will not impact shareholders greatly by undue delays in revealing etc. At a one product company on the other hand (remember different standards are okay to apply) the BLA etc. concerns the fate of investors’ investment etc. and it is hard to argue it is not significant enough to be material (queue the posts trying to anyway). Also wait on the post saying material information is absolute standard whereas what constitutes reasonable communication is conveniently a relative standard based upon size, how mean the shorts are etc.