News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Hugon

11/11/21 12:50 PM

#383685 RE: Brinjal #383684

Confusing to say the least. Also, we should have followed the dying compassionate used cases closer and learned from that canary in the coal mine. They sadly were dying.
icon url

DaubersUP

11/11/21 12:56 PM

#383687 RE: Brinjal #383684

It will be interesting. Of the 40 cohorts how many received with remdesevir as SOC and what were those results
icon url

Jitz

11/11/21 1:04 PM

#383691 RE: Brinjal #383684

What you are saying makes sense for no showing any effect but doesn't line up with pr. Still struggling with:
..the trial, 120 patients were treated, with THREE-FOURTHS receiving 5(FIVE) days of study drug"

3/4 of 120 =90



icon url

loanranger

11/11/21 3:47 PM

#383780 RE: Brinjal #383684

"The way the PR is worded is a little confusing."

It's not confusing. It's wrong.
The author is having a bit of a rough go of things today.