News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Black-Ops

11/03/21 1:29 AM

#192295 RE: theswordman #192291

This is obvious a bitter battle between anti Nader shareholders and Nader.

I wont take up a sword in that battle. I fight for CYDY. If 50.00000001% of all legal shares vote no to the 200,000,000 shares;

Nader or who ever is in charge has one option. There is no more time on the clock. I new management team andwould take at least another 30 days for a new vote. Only a nonsecured loan would negate the reverse split need.

That option is, ONE MORE TIME, a reverse split. Those that disagree, FINE. Reap the rewards. The share market valuation of 1.18$ will be close to 50 cents the day after a 1 new for 4 old, worse if a 1 new for 10 old.

Our short sellers are rooting for a defeat of the 200 million.

What would I seek if I was the control person, or in this case the CEO? I would shove it up the no voters nose. 1 new for 10 old. I would encourage the malcontents to move along. Sell out. Any shareholder that cant see this has bitter emotional bonds that they cant see the facts before them.

I am in shock that what I thought were hard core investors have this Nader chip on their shoulder.

The 200,000,000 shares is a terrible pill I must swallow. A few of my pals know my exact opinion.

I am a pragmatic investor. Consider this the most important subject I have considered.

icon url

3X Charm

11/03/21 1:11 PM

#192375 RE: theswordman #192291

That was befor Pestel arbitration loss and proxy fight, Pestell was $7.6million alone.