InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Rubyred77

10/20/21 12:37 PM

#333345 RE: Doc328 #333343

Right….

I’ll liquidate my holdings right away.

icon url

catdaddy

10/20/21 1:02 PM

#333347 RE: Doc328 #333343

So yes, Falconer is correct in stating PRE-084 is irrelevant.
icon url

frrol

10/20/21 2:32 PM

#333351 RE: Doc328 #333343

Yes. And the company's thesis is that our drugs, which are S1 agonist like PRE-084, are safer, and that they're worth testing in humans with real disease to see if the MOA is truly therapeutic.

And so the dissembling of formerly valid proclamations on hidden S1 antagonists by a competent researcher. I suspect the importance of clinical trials vs "mouse(murine)" models are a little clearer now.