Those would not be useful in drafting such a sensitive document about an already in progress trial. That’s it his thug, and anyone who does regulatory filings would know it’s not for a random person to come into a company and start drafting it’s absolutely most important document that has absolutely nothing to do with him. He wad there for assistance on future trials and getting DCVax ultimately approved as a general cancer vaccine, and as you have surmised elsewhere, as the eyes and ears of Merck. Therefore this hypothesis would make no sense.
Additionally the entire theory is further based on the notion that everyone else was unblinded and he was the only person they could find who was not, which is completely false and is the short argument for why the trial and SAP revision are invalid. I would agree with them regardless of Duffy, if that were the case. It’s false.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
