He took out those restricted shares to forgive and decrease over a million dollars of debt to the PHIL. It also shows that they believe by this time next year the price will be exponentially higher.
Which hurts shareholder value more? Having a million dollars in debt, payable on demand, or having the CEO lock up 200 million shares for at least a year, with a huge OS reduction to take place prior to that year being up?
Still waiting for a reply: The debt was there, so, which hurts shareholder value more? Having a million dollars in debt, payable on demand, or having the CEO lock up 200 million shares for at least a year, with a huge OS reduction to take place prior to that year being up?