Replies to post #229051 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[WebSlinger]

<< you did not retrieve the correct patent. That is the Notre Dame patent. The reason you are having trouble finding the patent that Thompson mentions is because it hasn't received a patent number yet. No approval, no patent number. >>

That is absolutely correct.

According to the recent SEC S-1A document (filed by KBLB a few days ago), that patent was filed on 11-Feb-2021. And we are now to believe that just 4 months later, a patent has been granted. That is complete BS.

KBLB knows this. That is why they put in that same document that they don't have ANY patents.

If you go to the website for the European Patent Office, you will find the following:

"FAQ - Applying for a Patent

Q: How long does the grant procedure take?

A: The European patent grant procedure takes about three to five years from the date your application is filed. It is made up of two main stages. The first comprises a formalities examination, the preparation of the search report and the preliminary opinion on whether the claimed invention and the application meet the requirements of the EPC. The second involves substantive examination."

https://www.epo.org/service-support/faq/own-file.html

So the European Patent Office basically states that it will take a minimum of about 3 years. Yet we are to believe that KBLB was able to do it in 4 months (while everything around the world has been slowed down by COVID).

Nonsense.

Once again, this is the CEO intentionally trying to trick investors into believing something that simply isn't true.

Like trying to trick investors into believing that the Army contract was fulfilled (when it wasn't).

Like trying to trick investors into believing that commercial production started 8 years ago (which it didn't).

Like trying to trick investors into believing that an uplisting was coming by Thanksgiving 2019 (which it didn't).

I could go on and on and on...

[sickzone]

this is the correct patent.

kim thompson and kraig biocraft are mentioned in the application along with patent family data.

[GTman1]

Sickzone, you did not retrieve the correct patent.

The PR never mentioned which patent. You assumed it was the one Truth posted. It wasn't. The knock in/out patent is new and will take a while before it's granted.

The patent mentioned in the PR was the same one that the company PR'd when it was granted in Vietnam, Korea, Australia, Canada and South Korea. It was laughed at before because people didn't care about those countries. Now it's been granted for the EU.

Workman Nydegger is fulfilling the job that Notre Dames attorneys couldn't do.

There was a typo in the s-1, but then again, that wasn't known until after the whole morning of misassumptions