Replies to post #177766 on Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[My69Charger]

On the flip side of that, then the company could have clearly said they're not a target & in fact, are simply cooperating with an outside investigation by 3-rd parties, un-related to the corporation.

You are leaving out that "constitutional right", also.

[3X Charm]

This statement is INCORRECT, Except for the warrant versus CYDY subpoena and probable cause. Everything else is WRONG.

“ The fact that CYDY was issued subpoenas mean that CYDY IS NOT A TARGET of the investigation”, is ludicrous!

Quitting while ahead is best. Way off base with the “ constitutional rights” nonsense.

“Several statutes specifically state that a subpoenaed party will not be excused from providing evidence that is self incriminating “

While getting a subpoena does not necessarily mean you are a target of an investigation, it certainly does not EXCLUDE you from being a target.

Best example in the news is our former President Trump. He is under investigation for tax issues and they have issued subpoenas of his tax records for proof. He fighting the subpoenas, which is his right to do.

SEC and DOJ want CYDY records because they are under investigation about claims made regarding LL. The records are being subpoenaed to find out what the company knew and when they knew it, to see how that matches up with public statements and insider sale of stock and if NP mislead investors.( 10- K for information).

I personally believe Noddor is in deep trouble for his misleading statements in forums to which “ safe harbor” provisions of forward looking statements do not apply.