Replies to post #4030 on Globalist Reality Report

[janice shell]

The only point that's relevant: Were there 45 to 50,000 deaths?

Of course not. As Blackhawks said earlier:

The vaxes would be off the market by now, as would any vax or drug that killed that many people in that period of time.

He's absolutely right. And by the way, why is it we only hear about all these "deaths" from the anti-vaxxers? Where are the relatives of the victims? Why aren't they on TV, sobbing their eyes out, all day, every day?

Because they don't exist, that's why.

[newmedman]

It's a public database. Nobody is blowing the whistle on anything. Manipulate the data any way you want.... Not to mention that the public can report there as well, which means they don't even have to be a medical professional to file a report..... wether it's true or not.

The big case that you're all hot about isn't going to last a minute in Judicial time. It's going to get tossed quicker than you can say 'go', so you can include the Judiciary into your conspiracy theory also.

I could look up numbers there all night and file a two page court filing as well. I'll even swear what I know is the truth under penalty of perjury. Doesn't mean I'll get convicted in a court if I actually believed it.

I could go grab numbers and prove a theory that since Santa and thee Easter bunny didn't visit my holiday party last year, everyone got so depressed that they died. Then I could have a bunch of my social media followers log on and tell the same story.

Doesn't make it true but, yet again, it will not stand up in any court in this land.

But you can give to my gofundme, just incase. Or buy my magic Christmas and Easter pellets that will bring ol' Kris and the Bunny back.

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

DISCLAIMER:

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.
Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.
VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public.