Replies to post #37 on World Wireless Communications (WWRL)

[creede]

Looks like you are correct. This is from their Twitter account.

Pinned post.

“Sticking point: @Alpharidge_Cap wants to ensure that EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS ARE PROTECTED in all merger transactions. Thus, it intends to include a Restrictive Clause, forbidding Reverse-Splits for two years minimum after closing the deal, in all of its merger agreements.”

Sticking point: @Alpharidge_Cap wants to ensure that EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS ARE PROTECTED in all merger transactions. Thus, it intends to include a Restrictive Clause, forbidding Reverse-Splits for two years minimum after closing the deal, in all of its merger agreements.

— Opportunity Zones Capital, LLC (@opportunityzon) July 17, 2021

[creede]

YES!!!!

It just hit!!!

WWRL targeted by Alpharidge on 07/20/2021

Case Information


A-21-838105-C | Alpharidge Capital LLC, Plaintiff(s) vs. World Wireless Communications, Inc., Defendant(s)


Case Number
A-21-838105-C

Court
Department 30

Judicial Officer
Wiese, Jerry A.

File Date
07/19/2021

Case Type
Other Civil Matters

Case Status
Open

Party

Plaintiff
Alpharidge Capital LLC


Active Attorneys

Lead Attorney
Shafer, Jay A.
Retained

Defendant
World Wireless Communications, Inc.


Events and Hearings


07/19/2021 Complaint

Comment
[1] Application for Appointment of Custodian

07/19/2021 Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

Comment
[2] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

Loading financial, please wait...


https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Portal/Case/CaseDetail?eid=PeduD6Becdkaporzgmcs8g2&tabIndex=3

[creede]

You seeing L2? Ask is very thin. Maybe the float really is near 2 or 3 million.