Basically, I doubt they're friends and I'm surprised the judge is setting aside the dilution clause seeing,, in peters own words, "to the depriment of shareholders" That can only mean Peter struck a deal with the noteholders like he did with EXBX early on and a deal is a deal. The judge actually is the one that screwed everyone. She could have made Lazar file the voluntary termination like he did with LGBI which was a SEC fine that carried over, no deal could be struck.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
