Why would I give the Carter/Chanbond waterfall any validity? Because it was going to be entered into the settlement agreement. So that the Attorneys, the litigation funder and Carter are taken care of - I have told everyone from the beginning that shareholders are last in line to be paid - shareholders receiving 33% is shareholder created wishful thinking.
"Why would you give the waterfall any validity? Are you calling that a 'fact'?"
Market Data 
Markets 
