News Focus
News Focus
icon url

novascotiaSTS

06/11/21 10:37 AM

#659333 RE: wcheng #659330

She has never even once spoken to the source herself.

She expected to get paid based on „I heard something from someone who heard it from someone else...“

Obviously this would have never worked....
icon url

dimples52

06/11/21 10:47 AM

#659346 RE: wcheng #659330

How can you mention "the Source" all thru your court filings and not willing to give the name. I'm not a lawyer but the job I had before retirement was investigating employees issues and concerns. If there was a situation of a "hearsay" comment(s) I needed the name or evidence in order to continue the investigation. If the employee was unwilling to provide there was no more I could do but close the case due to insufficient data. AG is an attorney she should have known the court would ask for the identification of the Source. So she should have prior to the filings asked this person can she give his/her identification. She really needs to stop and let this end.
icon url

2kidsnomoney

06/11/21 10:49 AM

#659349 RE: wcheng #659330

I wasn't listening in on the call so I'm working off of what is being shared on the board. I doubt she would put her job as a lawyer on the line by referencing and basing her efforts on a make-believe source. She must have concrete proof and feel confident about it and about anyone behind the scenes helping her. I think she's prepared to keep this going and if needed reveal her source at a later date IF needed. It sounds to me she may be more prepared than we realize. Just my opinion!!