InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lajrchamp

06/05/21 8:10 AM

#681430 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #681429

Good post. I'm in favor of the Supremes having as many bases as possible to hang their hats on. I think they have enough. It's wondering what remedy they come back with that keeps me up at night...that and the waiting. Like you, I'm hoping for good times.
icon url

Wingsjr

06/05/21 2:42 PM

#681448 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #681429

What you just posted is unconstitutional, the President pics who he nominates to serve in the Executive branch. No one can tell him who to pic, only Congress can say no by not confirming. This clause violates the separation of both executive and legislative branches. Add the can’t be interfered by the Judicial branch and you have an unconstitutional trifecta. HIRA should be DoA.
icon url

bradford86

06/05/21 4:48 PM

#681458 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #681429

Yeah these constitutional claims are confusing. The apa claims are very straight forward. It will be interesting if scotus finds a way to keep calabria